The sting is a movie about con mans and their how they stole
money. Then after they stole 11,000
dollars the policy is after them. It
involves a dirty cop who they end up paying off with counterfeit bills because
they spend all of their money they stole.
A bookie from Chicago named Shaw steals/cheats his way into 15,000
dollars from Lonnegan, the main character.
This
movie has a few less interesting parts in it, this could be because it is an
older movie and I have a hard time getting into older movies. Also there are so many characters in the
movie that it is hard to keep them all straight and keep what they are doing in
order. Some qualities that I am going to
talk about are the sound effects and dialogue, the musical side of the film,
and the acting in it.
The
sound effects and dialogue in the movie were at the top of what was available
at that time and did all that it could do to add to the film. But I didn't like some of the choices that
were made in it. During the poker game I
thought it was hard to hear and understand what was going on. The dialogue was a little troubling to
understand and the sound effects didn't do justice to the atmosphere it was
in. I believe that they were not able to
keep the rhythmic patterns in tact because of what the movie did with the
dialogue; the movie was rather choppy and didn't flow as well as it could
have. The potential with this kind of
movie is way higher than what I got out of the movie, partially I think because
the dialogue. The sound links that helps
transition from scene to scene were, in my opinion, the best parts of the sound
effects and dialogue.
The
musical side of the film was good. The
audio of a movie is important because it helps the audience relax. If there is too much silence in a film the
audience will get restless and feel weird.
In the book it talks about how the musical score of a film is very
important and for a couple of reasons.
The first of which is how it strengthens the emotional content of the
image, this helps leave a lasting impression on the audience and allows them to
take more from each individual scene.
The second is how it stimulates the imagination; sometimes the visual
effects are not enough to do this, so we rely on the music to do it for
us. I believe that the film did a good
job using the audio of the movie to stimulate imagination. The third and final is how it suggests
emotions that cannot be expressed by visuals alone. This takes some responsibility off of the
film itself and gives it to the audio.
It is easier sometimes for the music to do this because it allows us to
use our own imagination and it draws on us personally. Also, because many people are so driven/moved
by music it makes stimulating emotions easier.
The
acting of the movie was alright. It was
probably some of the best acting for that time but since we have such good
actors now it is hard to compete. The
primary goal of acting is to convince us that the character is real, I just
wasn’t getting this feeling throughout the movie. I thought that they could have put more
effort in their performances to make me believe what they were trying to
do. I also believe that the acting in
the movie was more stage styled acting rather than actual movie acting. The best thing that the actors did was how
they reacted to what happened in the film, I liked how Lonnegan reacted when
Shaw cheated him out of 15,000 dollars in poker. I liked it because it was relatable, when
someone beats me in something I get very upset when I thought he did well.
No comments:
Post a Comment